Great points. I’ve never read Principia, but thanks to, …

Comment on New forum by Wild Heretic.

Great points. I’ve never read Principia, but thanks to, my mind has become much more critical and I started to think properly for the first time. They really did strip a “fact” or statement down to its bare bones. For example, look at this sentence: “RMS Titanic was a British passenger liner that sank in the North Atlantic Ocean on 15 April 1912 after colliding with an iceberg during her maiden voyage from Southampton, UK to New York City, US.”

What is the very first question that needs to be asked? The primary questions is did the titanic exist in the first place? So “what” is the first question, then if it sank, and then if it was the iceberg that sank it, and then the “why”.

It’s amazing how evidence surfaces which even puts a positive answer to the primary question in doubt. Of course, conspiracy theory is all about the “how” and the “why” and never ever the “what”. For that reason, I think a lot of conspiracy stuff is deliberately propagated to trap the intelligent ones who ask questions.

I have no qualms with Keppler and the like with their predictions of planetary motions relative to the Sun and each other. In fact, I think they are spot on… just wrong philosophy and they can also leave the Earth out of their calculations. Their predictions would be no less correct if the “planets” were tiny and revolved elliptically around a small Sun in the middle of the Earth.

I think I have a workable theory on what the stars are. Damn simple really. Will do an article after the next one about it.

Thanks for commenting.

Wild Heretic Also Commented

New forum
Thanks Trevin.

I like alternative theories to gravity because I don’t believe in the official narrative. The question is if any of these theories is true or not? I don’t know. At the moment I am sticking with gravity coming from the sun. What that is, I don’t know.

“As another separate thing, I know that gravity is a pull and not a push because of tops; tops can’t spin with their sides as close to the ground as they get without these sides being pushed directly to the ground if gravity is a push. ”

I don’t think wobble matters either way. It’s the angular momentum keeping the top up, isn’t it?

New forum
Gary, you have to sign up and then I will approve you. After approval, you can reply to posts or start threads.

New forum
Don’t know, but very interesting all the same. Possibly a large meteor burning through the glass. It looked far too short for it to be a reflection on a cloud from something on the ground, unless it was a ground explosion. Wouldn’t we see the light from the ground explosion on the horizon first though?

Recent Comments by Wild Heretic

Heliocentric theory is wrong (pt1)
One possibility (look under “planets”):

Personally, I much prefer the other idea that retrograde motion is caused by speed variation/planet tilt. The idea in my CET is that the sun is the outermost body near the center of the cavity and spins the slowest. The rest are inside the sun’s orbit a little bit closer to the center of the cavity. Sometimes when a planet gets too close to the sun/moon it is attracted/repelled to or from that body (or maybe other planets as well) which slows the planet down, or speeds it up. Something like that.

It has been a while since I looked at Jupiter in Stellarium and got latitude readings at the equator over 5 years, so my mind isn’t fresh on the above theory. I have yet to get the longitude data for Jupiter for example and compare it to the sun’s position.

It isn’t something I am concentrating on right now.

There is glass in the sky
Very difficult question. I don’t know. I assume the creator(s) of this biosphere. What then is the purpose of this biosphere?

The glass could be needed to add extra pressure to keep the flood waters below the earth, and/or to block out some of the harsh sunlight radiation. It seems to be a key component to the biosphere.

Why hide the concave earth?
Monsters Inc is older than this article I think, so I would say they got it from the source, which is Monroe’s books.

Space machines do not orbit the Earth
When you are at Davos, you can ask them.

There are satellites up there IMO, just their deployment is not as we are told. Why? Because they are using heliocentric theory as a cover. Why? I’ll leave you to figure that one out.

Space machines do not orbit the Earth
I personally think the moon is reflected light from the back of the Sun. The negative cooling effects come from the “positive” charge of the Sun which is pushing the moon around Sun.

Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.