Comment on New forum by Wild Heretic.
Funny you should mention that. I was looking casually into the “star in front of the shadow moon” the other day. I don’t think it would be atmospheric refraction as both the light from the moon and star have to pass through the same atmosphere together. I wonder if a star has ever been seen in front of the illuminated part of the moon or perhaps the moon’s brightness is too much for telescopes to pick that out if it exists at all.
I want to record here in this comment a very, very near full moon location tonight.
Location: Midlands Ireland
Date: 29 July 2015
Sun position: roughly west – and roughly 15-20 degree elevation perhaps. Close to setting.
Moon position: roughly south east – the same elevation as the sun. Close to rising.
EDIT: as the evening progressed, the moon rose in the sky but gained a maximum elevation which was pretty low. It looked to be around the same position as the Sun was 6 months ago. This would make sense, as I read that the star field elevation on Dec 21st is the same as the Sun elevation on June 21st and vice verse on the summer solstice.
If we use Steve’s gegenshein model for moon illumination, which I think is pretty good and what I had initially in mind with the theory that the moon is the back of the Sun, then what is changing the phases is the cyclical nature of the electrified cavity as the sun’s light field moves in relation to the physical sun itself. The moon isn’t directly on the opposite side of the sky to the sun (which varies position) because light bends less at night skewering the back of the Sun’s actual position perhaps.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFxIKwOfPkU (around 10:40 min)
Certainly something to think about.
Wild Heretic Also Commented
I like alternative theories to gravity because I don’t believe in the official narrative. The question is if any of these theories is true or not? I don’t know. At the moment I am sticking with gravity coming from the sun. What that is, I don’t know.
“As another separate thing, I know that gravity is a pull and not a push because of tops; tops can’t spin with their sides as close to the ground as they get without these sides being pushed directly to the ground if gravity is a push. ”
I don’t think wobble matters either way. It’s the angular momentum keeping the top up, isn’t it?
Gary, you have to sign up and then I will approve you. After approval, you can reply to posts or start threads.
Don’t know, but very interesting all the same. Possibly a large meteor burning through the glass. It looked far too short for it to be a reflection on a cloud from something on the ground, unless it was a ground explosion. Wouldn’t we see the light from the ground explosion on the horizon first though?
Recent Comments by Wild Heretic
Heliocentric theory is wrong (pt1)
One possibility (look under “planets”): http://www.wildheretic.com/what-are-the-astronomical-bodies/
Personally, I much prefer the other idea that retrograde motion is caused by speed variation/planet tilt. The idea in my CET is that the sun is the outermost body near the center of the cavity and spins the slowest. The rest are inside the sun’s orbit a little bit closer to the center of the cavity. Sometimes when a planet gets too close to the sun/moon it is attracted/repelled to or from that body (or maybe other planets as well) which slows the planet down, or speeds it up. Something like that.
It has been a while since I looked at Jupiter in Stellarium and got latitude readings at the equator over 5 years, so my mind isn’t fresh on the above theory. I have yet to get the longitude data for Jupiter for example and compare it to the sun’s position.
It isn’t something I am concentrating on right now.
There is glass in the sky
Very difficult question. I don’t know. I assume the creator(s) of this biosphere. What then is the purpose of this biosphere?
The glass could be needed to add extra pressure to keep the flood waters below the earth, and/or to block out some of the harsh sunlight radiation. It seems to be a key component to the biosphere.
Why hide the concave earth?
Monsters Inc is older than this article I think, so I would say they got it from the source, which is Monroe’s books.
Space machines do not orbit the Earth
When you are at Davos, you can ask them.
There are satellites up there IMO, just their deployment is not as we are told. Why? Because they are using heliocentric theory as a cover. Why? I’ll leave you to figure that one out.
Space machines do not orbit the Earth
I personally think the moon is reflected light from the back of the Sun. The negative cooling effects come from the “positive” charge of the Sun which is pushing the moon around Sun.