“I told you guys along time ago STEVEN is just …

Comment on New forum by Wild Heretic.

“I told you guys along time ago STEVEN is just playing games with you.”
Steven is an asset. That part would be correct. We knew that though, but we wanted information and every asset gives up some truth at the beginning. That is what we were looking for. It’s ok to play with fire if you always keep it at arm’s length and use discernment (i.e. use your own time to research).

“Over a year ago, I chatted with you and you said your data could conform to a PLANE!”
Can you refer to me that comment. I don’t believe I ever thought or said that. There was one time I was thinking it could be a bowl for a day or two.

“How does the SUN SET on the model Steve gives you?”
I don’t follow his model. The concave earth isn’t his model. I did not write this blog because of Steven or base it on his beliefs. I am my own mind and found his info on the glass sky which had evidence to back it up. The theoretical side of the inner workings of a concave earth on this blog is my model. There you can read about sunsets if you like.

Ah anagrams. Well look at that if you mix the letters up of the lead engineer, the founder and the name of the experiment they say that the rectilineator was a fraud and the earth is flat. Why didn’t I think of that? You made one mistake though: It is TEED not TWEED. So there goes your anagram.

Wild Heretic Also Commented

New forum
Thanks Trevin.

I like alternative theories to gravity because I don’t believe in the official narrative. The question is if any of these theories is true or not? I don’t know. At the moment I am sticking with gravity coming from the sun. What that is, I don’t know.

“As another separate thing, I know that gravity is a pull and not a push because of tops; tops can’t spin with their sides as close to the ground as they get without these sides being pushed directly to the ground if gravity is a push. ”

I don’t think wobble matters either way. It’s the angular momentum keeping the top up, isn’t it?

New forum
Gary, you have to sign up and then I will approve you. After approval, you can reply to posts or start threads.

New forum
Don’t know, but very interesting all the same. Possibly a large meteor burning through the glass. It looked far too short for it to be a reflection on a cloud from something on the ground, unless it was a ground explosion. Wouldn’t we see the light from the ground explosion on the horizon first though?

Recent Comments by Wild Heretic

Heliocentric theory is wrong (pt1)
One possibility (look under “planets”): http://www.wildheretic.com/what-are-the-astronomical-bodies/

Personally, I much prefer the other idea that retrograde motion is caused by speed variation/planet tilt. The idea in my CET is that the sun is the outermost body near the center of the cavity and spins the slowest. The rest are inside the sun’s orbit a little bit closer to the center of the cavity. Sometimes when a planet gets too close to the sun/moon it is attracted/repelled to or from that body (or maybe other planets as well) which slows the planet down, or speeds it up. Something like that.

It has been a while since I looked at Jupiter in Stellarium and got latitude readings at the equator over 5 years, so my mind isn’t fresh on the above theory. I have yet to get the longitude data for Jupiter for example and compare it to the sun’s position.

It isn’t something I am concentrating on right now.

There is glass in the sky
Very difficult question. I don’t know. I assume the creator(s) of this biosphere. What then is the purpose of this biosphere?

The glass could be needed to add extra pressure to keep the flood waters below the earth, and/or to block out some of the harsh sunlight radiation. It seems to be a key component to the biosphere.

Why hide the concave earth?
Monsters Inc is older than this article I think, so I would say they got it from the source, which is Monroe’s books.

Space machines do not orbit the Earth
When you are at Davos, you can ask them.

There are satellites up there IMO, just their deployment is not as we are told. Why? Because they are using heliocentric theory as a cover. Why? I’ll leave you to figure that one out.

Space machines do not orbit the Earth
I personally think the moon is reflected light from the back of the Sun. The negative cooling effects come from the “positive” charge of the Sun which is pushing the moon around Sun.

Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.