Comment on New forum by Wild Heretic.
I can only guess at the size of the Sun. We can try this one out:
Option 1. The size of the sun in the sky is between 0.52° and 0.54° which averages out as 0.53° around the equinoxes I think it is. The arc of the sky is 180°, so 180/0.53 is 339.62, so the Sun is 1/339.62 width in the sky. In my CET model I have the Sun just about at the centre, so 1/339.62 of the Earth’s vertical diameter is 6356.762km x 2 = 12713.524km (WGS84 ellipsoid model) which would make the Sun (12,713.524 / 339.62) = 37.434km or 23.26 miles in diameter (assuming of course that apparent size is in an any way accurate relationship to its actual one).
Option 2. Let’s keep this 1/339.62 fraction. I have the Sun at roughly 1 degree behind the centre and takes 12 hours to arc around half the circumference of a cylinder (on the equinoxes at least). Circumference of a circle is 2 times pie times radius. So, half the circumference is 3.142 degrees. 1/339.62 of 3.142 degrees is 0.00925 degrees which is the Sun diameter. The horizontal Earth diameter is 12756.274km. This distance divided by 180 is 70.868km which is the km distance of one degree. So The sun would be 0.655km or only 655m. This option is based on the speculation that the entire sky dome is contained in the circular movement of the Sun in the centre. It probably isn’t; in fact I’m pretty sure it isn’t, but I’d just throw that out there anyway.
The problem here is that I have the varied density of the aether as a big factor behind the size and brightness of objects in the sky, so what we see in the sky is by no means rock solid as a basis for any quick back of the envelope calculations.
Wild Heretic Also Commented
I like alternative theories to gravity because I don’t believe in the official narrative. The question is if any of these theories is true or not? I don’t know. At the moment I am sticking with gravity coming from the sun. What that is, I don’t know.
“As another separate thing, I know that gravity is a pull and not a push because of tops; tops can’t spin with their sides as close to the ground as they get without these sides being pushed directly to the ground if gravity is a push. ”
I don’t think wobble matters either way. It’s the angular momentum keeping the top up, isn’t it?
Gary, you have to sign up and then I will approve you. After approval, you can reply to posts or start threads.
Don’t know, but very interesting all the same. Possibly a large meteor burning through the glass. It looked far too short for it to be a reflection on a cloud from something on the ground, unless it was a ground explosion. Wouldn’t we see the light from the ground explosion on the horizon first though?
Recent Comments by Wild Heretic
Heliocentric theory is wrong (pt1)
One possibility (look under “planets”): http://www.wildheretic.com/what-are-the-astronomical-bodies/
Personally, I much prefer the other idea that retrograde motion is caused by speed variation/planet tilt. The idea in my CET is that the sun is the outermost body near the center of the cavity and spins the slowest. The rest are inside the sun’s orbit a little bit closer to the center of the cavity. Sometimes when a planet gets too close to the sun/moon it is attracted/repelled to or from that body (or maybe other planets as well) which slows the planet down, or speeds it up. Something like that.
It has been a while since I looked at Jupiter in Stellarium and got latitude readings at the equator over 5 years, so my mind isn’t fresh on the above theory. I have yet to get the longitude data for Jupiter for example and compare it to the sun’s position.
It isn’t something I am concentrating on right now.
There is glass in the sky
Very difficult question. I don’t know. I assume the creator(s) of this biosphere. What then is the purpose of this biosphere?
The glass could be needed to add extra pressure to keep the flood waters below the earth, and/or to block out some of the harsh sunlight radiation. It seems to be a key component to the biosphere.
Why hide the concave earth?
Monsters Inc is older than this article I think, so I would say they got it from the source, which is Monroe’s books.
Space machines do not orbit the Earth
When you are at Davos, you can ask them.
There are satellites up there IMO, just their deployment is not as we are told. Why? Because they are using heliocentric theory as a cover. Why? I’ll leave you to figure that one out.
Space machines do not orbit the Earth
I personally think the moon is reflected light from the back of the Sun. The negative cooling effects come from the “positive” charge of the Sun which is pushing the moon around Sun.