Comment on New forum by Wild Heretic.
Totally new to Concave Theory. Just a few observations. In the 80’s the Russians drilled “down” some 12 kilometers through all kinds of rock. Though they tried to go deeper, they could not. It was like they hit the proverbial “brick wall.” Of coarse they were thinking they were drilling from the outside in.
Drilling from the inside out, could they have hit the outer shell of a manufactured orb?
A tough one to call. I say no. There are lots of anecdotal stories of the underworld. My best guess is that there has to be something vortexian or a portal or another “dimension” or something along those lines when we look at caves that supposedly go through to the “other side”.
Is the moon we observe inside, a projection of the outside of the earth?
Lunar Hologram Wave Filmed During Eclipse -Historic! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4CCJxF7nIcM
This would explain the films by Crrow777
Seen it. It is a gem, that’s for sure. I never thought of it as a projection of the outside. Sure, why not? There’s a fellow called Sculelos on flat earth forum who thinks the moon is a reflection of parts of the Earth’s crust. Worth looking into. He has diagrams. Type in “concave Earth” in flat Earth forums search engine. It’s in there somewhere.
I wonder if the “star field” is a star map? Perhaps even containing worm holes to reach those alien realms?
I don’t think so at least. ATM I just think they are bits of the Sun trapped in its electric field.
The poles are exit holes from the concave earth? If the Nazis went through the southern vortex, they would now occupy the surface which would account for all the apparent moon bases there.
Food for thought.
Could NASA be sending our rockets and satellites in the same manner? Could our “satellites” be out there?
No doubt exhibitions have been sent. Welcome or not I don’t know. Etidorpha suggests that some of the American masons of the 19th century had “underworld” contacts (not meant in a negative sense).
Wild Heretic Also Commented
I like alternative theories to gravity because I don’t believe in the official narrative. The question is if any of these theories is true or not? I don’t know. At the moment I am sticking with gravity coming from the sun. What that is, I don’t know.
“As another separate thing, I know that gravity is a pull and not a push because of tops; tops can’t spin with their sides as close to the ground as they get without these sides being pushed directly to the ground if gravity is a push. ”
I don’t think wobble matters either way. It’s the angular momentum keeping the top up, isn’t it?
Gary, you have to sign up and then I will approve you. After approval, you can reply to posts or start threads.
Don’t know, but very interesting all the same. Possibly a large meteor burning through the glass. It looked far too short for it to be a reflection on a cloud from something on the ground, unless it was a ground explosion. Wouldn’t we see the light from the ground explosion on the horizon first though?
Recent Comments by Wild Heretic
Heliocentric theory is wrong (pt1)
One possibility (look under “planets”): http://www.wildheretic.com/what-are-the-astronomical-bodies/
Personally, I much prefer the other idea that retrograde motion is caused by speed variation/planet tilt. The idea in my CET is that the sun is the outermost body near the center of the cavity and spins the slowest. The rest are inside the sun’s orbit a little bit closer to the center of the cavity. Sometimes when a planet gets too close to the sun/moon it is attracted/repelled to or from that body (or maybe other planets as well) which slows the planet down, or speeds it up. Something like that.
It has been a while since I looked at Jupiter in Stellarium and got latitude readings at the equator over 5 years, so my mind isn’t fresh on the above theory. I have yet to get the longitude data for Jupiter for example and compare it to the sun’s position.
It isn’t something I am concentrating on right now.
There is glass in the sky
Very difficult question. I don’t know. I assume the creator(s) of this biosphere. What then is the purpose of this biosphere?
The glass could be needed to add extra pressure to keep the flood waters below the earth, and/or to block out some of the harsh sunlight radiation. It seems to be a key component to the biosphere.
Why hide the concave earth?
Monsters Inc is older than this article I think, so I would say they got it from the source, which is Monroe’s books.
Space machines do not orbit the Earth
When you are at Davos, you can ask them.
There are satellites up there IMO, just their deployment is not as we are told. Why? Because they are using heliocentric theory as a cover. Why? I’ll leave you to figure that one out.
Space machines do not orbit the Earth
I personally think the moon is reflected light from the back of the Sun. The negative cooling effects come from the “positive” charge of the Sun which is pushing the moon around Sun.