I’ll add: I expected their official site to explain satellite …

Comment on Heliocentric theory is wrong (pt2) by R. E..

I’ll add: I expected their official site to explain satellite travel by saying something vague about inertia plus less friction at great heights, plus Earth’s mass keeps these objects close by though not close enough to crash to Earth. But no, a few years ago I saw their official answer on their Q&A page. Someone asked how fixed satellites stay fixed, and the NASA approved answer made no sense. I sometimes think they are trying to get us to notice discrepancies while also drip feeding us expensive and elaborate BS.

This, and i could find few actual photos of planets in our solar system – they were all noted as artistic renderings (paintings and CGI). Why not update the site with images from their billion dollar telescopes?

R. E. Also Commented

Heliocentric theory is wrong (pt2)
Oops I jumped in with my comment about Mach’s Principle without reading the rest of QE’s comments.

Heliocentric theory is wrong (pt2)
x2mm (I can’t reply to your above comment, so I’ll do so here), yes I was teasing. I know that Einstein was another hired hand and that his Theory of Relativity is incorrect, because his model of our universe is incorrect. Our universe is moreso like a DC engine.

Heliocentric theory is wrong (pt2)
Beyond the speed of light? It’s on a roll then. Lol

Recent Comments by R. E.

Heliocentric theory is wrong (pt1)
“I am amazed that people are willing to advertise their unintelligence in public :O”

The pity is mutual.

Space machines do not orbit the Earth
Let us always remember: NASA is the one pulling out impossibly imprecise and vast numbers and distances from their hat – 30,000,000,000 light years away and so on. So cavalier, so certain. Like a psychopath.

The purpose is to trigger peoples’ cognitive dissonance so that they (we) can’t think critically or ask good questions. And people believe and cling to this stuff.

It reminds me of those sad experiments with the baby monkeys clinging to the stuffed animal “mama” (prevailing current wisdom drip fed by the authorities and higher education) rather than eat (do what was good for themselves). They starved.

Concave Earth Theory
make that “sketched a grid…”

Concave Earth Theory
To be fair I guess: a skeptic would say that it’s not a concave earth model as much as a flattened sphere effect which the cartographers sketched. That is, a sphere whether concave or convex experiences distortion and this is an acknowledgement of that. For example, if you sketched a grip on an intact orange peel then flattened it against a counter – the grid lines would distort.

Me I tend toward believing that Earth is a penal colony for rebellious souls.

Concave Earth Theory
Fascinating. First time I have seen / noticed the concave lat / longitude markings. Unmistakable once pointed out. Huh.

Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.